Unthinkable?

What if the unthinkable happened?

What if there was a massive school shooting in an elementary school in your town? 

An attack that resulted in 20 children murdered in the halls and classrooms within minutes.  The news media splashes the report and the number of victims, and the nation groans in sorrow and sickness.  Your local community mourns the loss of precious lives.  

You whisper, "Not again.  O please, not again.  And not here, so close to home."

Reports of this type of attack are all too common.  And almost always there are the conversations back and forth, ranging from blaming guns or mental illness, and a call for some kind of solution or better security.

But... 

What if this shooting was different?

What if, in the day after the shooting, the investigation uncovers a very different nature in this attack.  The news flashes across the airwaves and headlines to the attention of Americans everywhere.  And what is the update?

That law enforcement has found, through written documentation and by verbal testimony that the shooter (apprehended alive) was not only sane, but that he was hired to commit the attack, by the parents of the children whom he shot to death!

What do you suppose would be the reaction of the townspeople in your community?  And in cities and villages across the Union?  

Horror?  Indignation?  Outrage?  

I think all of those.  I believe that it would rock the nation to the core, and they would want justice.

Do you think that the people in our society would simply demand that the shooter be charged and indicted for the violent crime of murder?  Or do you think they would want each parent who paid the shooter to face prosecution as well for their part in the bloody affair?

Or, maybe every upstanding citizen in the nation would say, 

“We cannot prosecute those parents.  We don’t know what they were going through, and they are equal victims alongside their murdered children.” 

God forbid! They would not  and should not be viewed or treated as if they were equal victims along with the children.  They were not be victims at all: they had sought out the slaughter of their son or daughter!  To call them “victims” and refuse to prosecute them would be a travesty of justice and further treachery toward the true victims—the 20 boys and girls they hired someone to shoot to death.

It is likely that you, the reader, sit in disbelief at the thought.  Such a circumstance and treacherous violence toward one's own flesh and blood could never happen. 

Could it?

Yet this type of "unthinkable" situation happens every day.

Two children, even younger and more vulnerable than elementary students are slain in our country every minute statistically.  That is 20 children every 10 minutes.  And every single one of their murders is done at the behest of the parents.  That murder is called ABORTION.

Parents who seek to kill their children are NOT victims. 

Abortion must be abolished.

Not Fearful Enough

"Most Abortion-Minded Women 

Aren't Calculating Killers.  

They are Afraid."

This was the headline of an article from The Gospel Coalition Web site on May 19th, 2019.  This assertion is a factor in the mindset of the ProLife establishment.  It fuels the idea that women who choose abortion are victims.  ProLife people will therefore often conclude that the guilt of the mother is lessened, and in some situations completely erased.

But let us consider that 

There are a lot of members of the Mafia, who killed because they were afraid...

AFRAID the authorities would catch them.

AFRAID the person would talk.

AFRAID they would have to share the money.

AFRAID to lose their reputation as a tough guy. 

AFRAID the Boss would kill them.

Does being afraid absolve members of the Mafia of guilt?

There is no doubt that fear can be a driver of murder.

So what?  

That doesn't change the fact that murder is still a sin and a crime.

And abortion is murder.  It should be treated as such.

I would have to say that the reason people murder their children in abortion is because they are not fearful ENOUGH.

There is no escaping the fact that regardless of why parents may choose to commit child sacrifice, they are lacking the ONE FEAR they SHOULD have.

Psalm 36:1 "The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes."

We find it again in the New Testament: 

Romans 3:10-18 
10 "As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:" 
11 "There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God." 
12 "They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one." 
13 "Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips:" 
14 "Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness:" 
15 "Their feet are swift to shed blood:" 
16 "Destruction and misery are in their ways:" 
17 "And the way of peace have they not known:" 
18 "There is no fear of God before their eyes."

As Pastor and abolitionist, James Kip Farrar puts it:

"There is no contradiction between being fearful and being a calculating killer.  In fact, they fear losing safety, security, and prosperity, and they calculate that killing their child is the best way to avoid losing those things.  But ultimately they are not fearing the appropriate person...the One Who can destroy both the body and the soul."

Jesus Christ, while He walked among us, warned us of the following in Matthew 10:28 "And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell."

The fear of the LORD is good.  It drives us to repent of our wicked way, and run to Him instead.

Proverbs 14:27 "The fear of the LORD is a fountain of life, to depart from the snares of death."

Proverbs 16:6 "By mercy and truth iniquity is purged: and by the fear of the LORD men depart from evil."

(https://not-a-victim.com/)

Abortion must be abolished.

The Worst of "Hit" Men

Abortionists are the WORST kind of serial killers, on at least 3 counts:

[I am aware that there is a difference between a hitman and serial killer, as the former get pay to slay, but in this post I am comparing abortionists to both categories in general.]

What are those three counts?

FIRST- MAGNITUDE: When we consider how many they have slain.

To be an official serial killer, one must kill at least 2 or 3 people, and not in one burst of angry uncontrolled passion.  Some of the most infamous serial killers in the last century would be:
A. Dennis (BTK)- convicted of murdering 10.
B. Jeffrey Dahmer (Milwaukee Monster)- convicted of murdering 17. 
C. Ted Bundy (Ted)- confessed to have murdered 30, maybe more.

America's deadliest serial killer on record, Samuel Little, has recently confessed to murdering 93 women in a little over 35 years.

BUT the average ABORTIONIST has killed hundreds, thousands, or tens of thousands, depending on how long they've been in the baby butcher business.
Ronald Yeomans, Orrin Moore, and Herbert C. Hodes (who presently murder in the Overland Park/Leawood, Kansas area) have been murdering for decades.  They are each in their 70's now, as many abortionists are.  There is an abortionist in his 80's who has slain over 80,000 children!  

The kill count of the likes of Leroy Carhart, George Tiller, Reid Goodman, Larry Burns, and Kermit Gosnell dwarf the lists of the most famous serial killers of born people

Therefore the abortionist's kill numbers far outnumbers the average serial killer or hitman.

SECOND- THE MARK: Who they target.  

The weaker or more vulnerable the victim, the more heinous the crime; for the victim is not as able to defend himself or herself (women, children, etc.)  We all understand that college students are more likely to get away from or overpower a killer than a kindergartner is.

When the average hitman or serial killer is planning to murder, he has to consider...
-whether the victim will come down THAT alley,
-whether they will be alone,
-whether the target is a "conceal-and-carry", a blackbelt, or a "former active duty" marine,
-whether a policeman or security guard will hear cries for help and investigate.

BUT, the ABORTIONIST targets the child in the womb, the weakest and least among us, who...
A) CANNOT run away.
B) CANNOT hide.
C) CANNOT barricade the door.
D) CANNOT fight back.
E) CANNOT scream for help.
F) CANNOT plead for mercy.
G) CANNOT dial 911

Therefore the ABORTIONIST has to carry no concern or care about repercussions, and danger to his or her person, for they are slaughtering a people group who have no voice nor vigor to worry about.

Which brings us to the 
THIRD- IMMUNITY: The protection for the perpetrator.

A serial killer must be careful not to get caught.  He must avoid leaving clues, fingerprints, DNA, etc., else the long arm of justice will put the pieces together that will convict him.

BUT the ABORTIONIST is openly plying his or her business of rampant baby murder.  His activities, his crimes, and the scene of the crime is no secret from the authorities.  The media, police, mayors, legislators, governors, judges, yea, our society as a whole, have made an agreement with death, to dehumanize the preborn, pervert the Constitution, and murder them without cause in the multi-millions.

Thus, even if the child in the womb COULD dial 911, the police would not come to their aid.  Instead it is the serial killer, this hitman, who has police protection, the culture's vocal approval, and nearly all the churches' silent permission.  He slaughters humans under "color" of law.

While the occasional hitman may have a crooked judge or corrupt law officers, who will cover for him, so that he may feel more free to slay without fear, the ABORTIONIST has open police support and social approval.

There is an old saying, "There is no REST for the wicked."

When it comes to abortion today, there is no ARREST for the wicked.

Based on these three points, I submit that ABORTIONISTS are the WORST of serial killers and hitmen.

Also, keep in mind that the Abortionist would kill ZERO people if parents didn't voluntarily bring the innocent humans in to be slaughtered.  Let it sink in... The one who is hiring the murderer to kill is the PARENT of the victim.   

Christians, 
We NEED to confess and forsake our sin of complacency, cowardice, complicity, and compromise concerning this murder of our fellow image bearers (AKA our neighbors, the fatherless, and the least of these)!

We NEED to call out the killers, seeking their repentance and salvation!

We NEED to cease to do evil, and learn to do well!

We NEED to confront our culture with the facts of the Holocaust in our midst, and the unfruitful works of darkness of the ABORTIONIST!

We NEED to contend with this evil!

We NEED to compel our leaders to do right, calling for justice and mercy and equity to be no more neglected!

We NEED to cry mightily unto God, "standing in the gap", pleading for mercy in the midst of wrath upon our cities, states, and nation, and beseech our God to stir us to love and righteousness, whatever others may do!

Abortion must be abolished.

So...Hitler wasn't a Murderer?

Let me explain.

I have heard from many in the ProLife Movement (both leaders and followers), that the abortionists are the murderers, but the people who seek the assassins out, deliver the victim, and pay the hitmen are NOT guilty of murder at all.

Why not?

Because they did not put their own hand to the forceps?

Following this line of thinking, then I guess that it would be INACCURATE to say that Hitler murdered millions of Jews, since I have no evidence that he himself personally ever directly murdered any Jew?

He just called for, sought for, gave orders to, and made provision for the Holocaust.  

So He wasn't guilty of murder?  (I speak as a fool.)  

Of course, we KNOW that Hitler murdered millions although he didn't do it with his own hands.  He used others to do his wicked bidding. 

If a man paid a killer for hire to murder his wife, it would not be just to only punish the hitman and let the husband off Scot free.  That would be a breach of justice.

We need to be consistent.  

We need to understand that abortionists only murder those that they are asked and paid to slay.

We also need to be aware that a growing majority of women presently do the killing themselves by taking pills designed to murder their children.  They can pull the abortion product off the shelf at drug stores, or that they ordered through the mail, and commit a DIY murder.

We must rightly see the situation and call for equal justice under the law for all.

Look up Bradley Pierce's video on Youtube called "Abortion and Justice Under the Law".

Abortion is murder and must be abolished.

Murder isn't Supposed to be Safe

For quite some time, the ProAbortion crowd has held up hangers and said, "Never again will we go back to when women had to use hangers!  Abortion needs to be SAFE!"  They talk about how hundreds of thousands of women died because of unsafe abortions when it wasn't allowed to kill preborn humans (Of course, they are often using numbers that were supplied by Bernard Nathanson, who later said he had fabricated the number, but let's go on).  They claim that if abortion becomes illegal again, some women will still choose to do it, and will resort to dangerous methods.  So they demand that abortion must remain legal so it can be SAFE.

The ProLife Movement has also put a lot of focus on trying to make abortion SAFE.  Some examples of legislative requirements that ProLife laws in this area include:
  -Wider hallways and doorways so that in emergencies, a gurney can be rolled in to help mothers.
  -Brighter lighting, cleaner instruments and operating areas, sinks in which to wash.
  -Inspections of facilities to make sure they are up to medical standards.
  -Admitting privileges for the abortionist at a hospital close enough to get women to quickly.
This is all, from the standpoint of the ProLife Establishment, a proper and good thing.

But there is a problem.  Both groups in this are seeking the safety of mothers in abortions.

What about the innocent child, who is UNSAFE, whether or not the procedure is done in a filthy shack or a sanitized facility?  With a hanger or a cannula?

Abortion is MURDER.  Shouldn't we be more intent on the safety and lives of the true victims?

Consider a comparison with the crime of mugging:

    "Since some muggers will continue to mug people no matter what the law says, and since mugging is not always safe for the mugger, we should make it legal to mug people, to make sure that people can mug other people safely."  That is FOOLISHNESS.  It is also a failure.

It is a failure to love our preborn neighbors as ourselves - We are to follow the second greatest commandment, not violate it.

It is a failure to secure true treatment - We need to treat the preborn like who they are and abortion like what it is.

It is a failure to establish equity - All humans should be given equal protection under the law from being murdered.

Let us not be guilty of partiality:

James  2:4,8-9 "Are ye not then partial in yourselves, and are become judges of evil thoughts? ...If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well: But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors."

MURDER is not supposed to be safe.

Murder is never safe for the victim, NOR SHOULD it be safe for the perpetrator.

To fail to protect the most vulnerable and innocent who are being spoiled,
while seeking to make sure that those who are oppressing them are well taken care of,
is to do wrong, and flies in the face of Jeremiah 22:3, which says, "Thus saith the LORD; 
Execute ye judgment and righteousness, and deliver the spoiled out of the hand of the oppressor: and do no wrong, do no violence to the stranger, the fatherless, nor the widow, neither shed innocent blood in this place."

This is why, while so many in our society, including both ProAbort and ProLife individuals, keep talking about and making laws about safety for women, the abolitionists continue to demand that Abortion must be abolished.

It Is Loving to Prosecute Murder

Question: After abortion becomes abolished as homicide, should women who still choose to hire someone to abort their children face any type of punishment?

Many Christian and Prolife leaders have protested that this would not be loving.

Many well-intentioned Christians would say that to make the mother prosecutable for the abortion of her son or daughter would be UNLOVING. 

However, it is the LOVE of Christ which constrains me to share the following. Please hang on with me as you read, for the truth's sake.  Here goes.

It will always be the most loving to treat murder as what it is—therefore, the abortionist and the mother who is are pursuing the murder of an innocent child should be prosecuted.  

One reason that empathy falls too heavy on the side of the mother for even those who seek justice for the preborn is largely due to women being broadly painted (by the prolife movement) as one of the victims in the abortion act.  But the fact is, no matter how they have be deceived, they know full well what they are doing.  Standing at the gates of death, I have seen and heard countless women who unashamedly shout that it is their right to kill their baby!  They laugh and mock what I am doing and tell me that I should do something worthwhile, like, save a tree.  They curse at me and my wife and children.  They rationalize their premeditated murder away and boast that it is "legal", which makes it "okay".  

Now abortion WILL brutalize the mother.  It will bring spiritual, emotional, and physical consequences—just as it does to all who murder—but especially to the abortive women, since the victim is her own child.  The mother who murders her baby in the womb may do so in a desperate situation, and MAY do so believing a lie.  But for the sake of God's word and true mercy on the baby that has been abused to death by the signed consent of his/her mother, we must treat the mother (in a desperate situation) who murders her baby at 3 months gestation no differently than the mother (in a desperate situation) who murders her 3 year old.

AGAIN will I state it.

If we do not treat it as such, we are hypocrites, guilty of having "respect of persons", and are perverting justice and equity (James 2:4,8-9).

If we will not truly treat abortion as murder, we are not only acting treacherously against our God and neighbor (thus breaking the first and second greatest commandments: Matthew 22:37-40), but we are also communicating to the ungodly that we don't really think it is the same as murder, and further entrenches the abomination of child sacrifice AS JUSTIFIED in our society.  That is UNLOVING to the lost all about us.  We undermine our position, and they see our inconsistency.

We Christians need to repent of our apathy, our compromise, and our inconsistency with God's law and grace.

We must agree with true justice and equity based in the Scripture, and protect the innocent and punish the evildoer.  

We need to cry mightily unto God, as the king of Nineveh decreed (Jonah 3:8-9), that God may have mercy on our nation.  If we stand for some lives and not for others, we become human rights hypocrites, failing to love our neighbor.

PUNISHING MURDER IS LOVING!

—IT IS LOVING to the real victims, the children in danger of destruction, showing care and respect to the value of their lives.

—IT IS LOVING to the millions already slain, vindicating their humanity and worth as image-bearers of their Creator.

—IT IS LOVING to other preborn children, who will not be murdered because their parents do not want to be punished as murderers.  It will be unfeigned love, for it will give them equal protection under the law.

—IT IS LOVING to parents, who will not murder their babies now that it is a punishable offense, thus sparing them becoming guilty of their children's slaughter.

—IT IS LOVING to the mother, already guilty of murder herself, giving her swift opportunity to face up to what she has done, repent of it, and find salvation and healing in Christ Jesus alone, thus removing YEARS of guilt, cover up, justification, and hardening, and if unrepentant rejecting Christ, eternal torment.  Also the father, if he was pursuing that murder as well.

—IT IS LOVING to families being pressured by angry relatives to abort, giving them the ability to say, "You're telling me to commit a felony?  To MURDER?"  Thus giving the legal clout to stand their ground.

—IT IS LOVING to the abortionists who will stop aborting because it is a punishable offense, bringing before their conscience the seriousness of their violence before the court of the Lord, showing them the depth of their sin, that he or she may personally face up to what they did, to repent, crying to God for mercy, and trusting in Jesus alone to save them from their sin, including their blood guiltiness.  It gives them more impetus to "cease to do evil, Learn to do well" (Isaiah 1:16-17). 

—IT IS LOVING to those in the medical profession or medical schools who may be tempted to seek that line of murderous occupation and will now be turned away by the knowledge of punishment they will be spared the guilt of murder on their conscience and record (Proverbs 19:25).

—IT IS LOVING to the abortionist who refuses to stop killing, for punishing him will stop him from adding to his "kill count", and thus his blood guiltiness before God.  It will remove any rationale of being a "hero of women" or being viewed as "a pillar in the community".  It can show him his sin in all its ramifications, and can humble him and bring him to the only place where he can find cleansing for his mass murders--at the foot of the cross, by the shed blood of the Lamb.

—IT IS LOVING to the other employees at the murder mills who will forsake it or not apply to work there because they don't wish to be punished as partakers of murder so that they may forsake the foolish and live, repenting of their involvement and be saved.

—IT IS LOVING to our society at large, bringing the perceived value of all life back to the place where it belongs.  Is it any surprise that people today are murdering fellow students, fellow employees, neighbors, family members, friends, enemies, and strangers, when we will countenance the murder of the MOST vulnerable and the MOST innocent?

—IT IS LOVING to the victims of rape, under aged and incestual molestation, and human trafficking, whose attackers, oppressors, and "owners" are escaping the evidence of their wickedness by pressuring or forcing to have the baby killed, covering up their crimes, and therefore presently being able to continue oppressing this victim and others.

—IT IS LOVING to the neighborhoods, communities, states, and this nation, in the midst of whom, innocent blood has been shed, to resolve that guilt and satisfy the demand of justice (see the example of the an unsolved murder in Deuteronomy 21:1-9), turning away impending judgment.  It is a humbling and acknowledgement of the evil we are guilty of, and, as some have said, "giving God a reason to show mercy", rather than arrogantly and proudly denying our bloody crime in the face of judgment.  It is "standing in the gap", repairing the breach, that God would not destroy us as we deserve (Ezekiel 22:30, but really the entire chapter). 

—IT IS LOVING to our Creator, the Maker of heaven and earth, "The Power that hath made and preserved us a nation" thus far, the Giver of Life and Life Everlasting, the One Who has granted inalienable rights in the first place, that we would be acknowledging His truth, recognizing and turning away from our perversion of justice and the slaughter of those made in His image.

—IT IS LOVING to our nation to remember that if our cause is NOT just, we will not CONQUER, or we will CONQUER in vain.  We must turn our hearts to turn the course of this people.  Let us who fear God, in returning the laws from targeting millions of our citizens to be massacred, instead to reflect liberty and justice for all, truly trusting God for the results, and do what is right. 

If we as Christians do not consistently obey and speak the truth in our society, as salt and light, if we are recreant to our responsibility, how can we expect our society to return to right and justice?  If we refuse to speak the truth, we expose our lack of love to all these.  We become manifest as hypocrites.

From a child, I have loved the Star Spangled Banner, our national anthem.  I love the words, the music, and the history behind it.  My favorite verse being the final one:

"And thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand

Between their loved homes and the war's desolation

Blest with vic'try and peace, may the Heav'n rescued land

Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation

Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,

And this be our motto: 'In God is our trust'

And the star spangled banner in triumph shall wave

O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave."

That we may not vainly say, "In God we trust" when we do not follow His commands.  

Jesus said, "And why call ye me Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?" (Luke 6:46).

"Let love be without dissimulation. Abhor that which is evil; cleave to that which is good."(Romans 12:9).  "Love without dissimulation" means that we are not just pretending to love, feigning that we care, but actually loving with sincerity, with a pure heart fervently (I Peter 1:22).

We MUST show love without dissimulation.

Abortion MUST be abolished.